Packages in experimental/arm64 tested in the last 24h for build reproducibility
19 packages (3.0% of 625) failed to build reproducibly in total, 3 (9.7% of 31) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
116 packages (18.6% of 625) failed to build from source in total, 5 (16.1% of 31) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
mumps
nodejs
linux
thunderbird
pluto-sat-code
42 packages (6.7% of 625) failed to satisfy their build-dependencies, 15 (48.4% of 31) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
miopen
grok
petsc4py
ruby-gitlab-labkit
janitor
slepc4py
incus
groestlcoin
liblsl
libewf
php-sabre-vobject#
zeekctl
node-solid-jose
q2-phylogeny
phonetisaurus
438 packages (70.1% of 625) successfully built reproducibly in total, 6 (19.4% of 31) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
mtail
libopenaptx
tcltk-defaults
subethasmtp
dino-im
rust-sysinfo
A package name displayed with a bold
font is an indication that this package has a note. Visited
packages are linked in green, those which have not been visited are
linked in blue.
A # sign after the name of a package
indicates that a bug is filed against it. Likewise, a
+ sign indicates there is a
patch available, a P means a
pending bug while # indicates a
closed bug. In cases of several bugs, the symbol is repeated.