Packages in experimental/arm64 tested in the last 24h for build reproducibility
37 packages (5.8% of 637) failed to build reproducibly in total, 5 (12.8% of 39) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
erlang
gle-graphics-manual
oxigraph
mesa
python-opencascade-pywrap
97 packages (15.2% of 637) failed to build from source in total, 3 (7.7% of 39) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
seqan2
fenicsx-performance-tests
python-ocp
76 packages (11.9% of 637) failed to satisfy their build-dependencies, 4 (10.3% of 39) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
php-sabre-vobject#
phonetisaurus
ruby-devise-i18n
groestlcoin
422 packages (66.2% of 637) successfully built reproducibly in total, 27 (69.2% of 39) of them in the last 24h in experimental/arm64:
ruby-aws-sdk
procenv
glew
tcl8.7
ldh-client
llvm-defaults
fenics-basix
rust-wasmtime
rust-rand-xoshiro
rust-xso-proc
sbd
node-typescript
ocaml
dolfinx-mpc
pkg-js-tools
pykdumpfile
mujs
python3-defaults
ifupdown-ng
perl
gle-graphics-library
tree-sitter-sdml
mongo-cxx-driver
etcd
rust-rxml-proc
jruby
golang-code.forgejo-f3-gof3
A package name displayed with a bold
font is an indication that this package has a note. Visited
packages are linked in green, those which have not been visited are
linked in blue.
A # sign after the name of a package
indicates that a bug is filed against it. Likewise, a
+ sign indicates there is a
patch available, a P means a
pending bug while # indicates a
closed bug. In cases of several bugs, the symbol is repeated.